Awesome, Alec. Dr. Mark Bailey just mentioned this in my interview with him yesterday, which I'll be posting soon on my Bitchute channel. In the meantime here's a recent conversation on similar subject matter with Dr. Jordan Grant ... https://www.bitchute.com/video/9bdHKhbQlxrK/
Alec, thanks so much man for reiterating over and over with increasing depth what Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman and crew have been talking about for these past few years.
I must admit, it's beginning to feel like an echo chamber, maybe a sensory deprivation chamber. I'm wondering if you have any stories to share where people on the "virology is infallible" side have been tipped to the "oh shit, this is a big fat lie" side.
I suppose I'm looking for success stories. Right now it breaks my heart how people who would dismiss the arguments you're putting forth do not seem capable of paraphrasing those arguments accurately, let alone prove them invalid. (Kirsch!) As you know, it seems that all anyone throws is strawman arguments, ad-hominem attacks, affirming the consequent, rinse repeat. I suppose I have my doubts that this conversion process ever happens and if it should even the be goal. Each side being impressively correct to their own team, mean while each side digs deeper into their position. How is that a win?
Deep down I'm afraid that even if the world were to flip to the "viruses have never proven to exist" but a strong sense of separateness and smugness prevailed, we will only create new categories of "other".
I think this sentiment is strongly tempering my willingess to "speak out" as I'm more likely to "talk down". Right now Eisenstein's "The More Beautiful World Our Hearts Know Is Possible" is helping steer my curiosity to awaken my heart to "the unity of us" and quiet down my perennially disappointed mind obsessed with the "problem with these fucking virologists". Because if these Wuhan Clan people succeed in robbing my ability to see the unity underlying all things, I might as well just get the jab.
Am I saying that you "talk down to people"? Ya. That's why I don't share your stuff even though I'm super down with the Contagion Myth.
Am I saying I have a solution? Not really, just typing a bunch shit right here an process it outloud.
Its a patronising cliche that is ubiquitous as a 'header' seeking clicks.
Marketing is not 'selling' for money so much as methods of subtle persuasion.
I wont tell you or anyone else 'all you need to know' because I could not POSSIBLY know 'all you need to know'. Nor is it my business to dictate your learning goals for you.
The ways we communicate will of course be our own, and viva le difference! But communication is a relationship not a condescension or cheat sheet for passing off as if to know a subject.
I offer a critical view because I believe the message is worthy of being set in honouring terms.
What do you find meaningful in being told all you need to know?
Thank you for all that you’re doing and have done to reveal truths that will set people free.
How can the pdf file be accessed for those who don't have telegram.
I found a download available at this site:
https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/22/debunking-the-nonsense/
THANK YOU to all the people involved in this. What an amazing offering.
Awesome, Alec. Dr. Mark Bailey just mentioned this in my interview with him yesterday, which I'll be posting soon on my Bitchute channel. In the meantime here's a recent conversation on similar subject matter with Dr. Jordan Grant ... https://www.bitchute.com/video/9bdHKhbQlxrK/
Alec, thanks so much man for reiterating over and over with increasing depth what Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman and crew have been talking about for these past few years.
I must admit, it's beginning to feel like an echo chamber, maybe a sensory deprivation chamber. I'm wondering if you have any stories to share where people on the "virology is infallible" side have been tipped to the "oh shit, this is a big fat lie" side.
I suppose I'm looking for success stories. Right now it breaks my heart how people who would dismiss the arguments you're putting forth do not seem capable of paraphrasing those arguments accurately, let alone prove them invalid. (Kirsch!) As you know, it seems that all anyone throws is strawman arguments, ad-hominem attacks, affirming the consequent, rinse repeat. I suppose I have my doubts that this conversion process ever happens and if it should even the be goal. Each side being impressively correct to their own team, mean while each side digs deeper into their position. How is that a win?
Deep down I'm afraid that even if the world were to flip to the "viruses have never proven to exist" but a strong sense of separateness and smugness prevailed, we will only create new categories of "other".
I think this sentiment is strongly tempering my willingess to "speak out" as I'm more likely to "talk down". Right now Eisenstein's "The More Beautiful World Our Hearts Know Is Possible" is helping steer my curiosity to awaken my heart to "the unity of us" and quiet down my perennially disappointed mind obsessed with the "problem with these fucking virologists". Because if these Wuhan Clan people succeed in robbing my ability to see the unity underlying all things, I might as well just get the jab.
Am I saying that you "talk down to people"? Ya. That's why I don't share your stuff even though I'm super down with the Contagion Myth.
Am I saying I have a solution? Not really, just typing a bunch shit right here an process it outloud.
Its a patronising cliche that is ubiquitous as a 'header' seeking clicks.
Marketing is not 'selling' for money so much as methods of subtle persuasion.
I wont tell you or anyone else 'all you need to know' because I could not POSSIBLY know 'all you need to know'. Nor is it my business to dictate your learning goals for you.
The ways we communicate will of course be our own, and viva le difference! But communication is a relationship not a condescension or cheat sheet for passing off as if to know a subject.
I offer a critical view because I believe the message is worthy of being set in honouring terms.
What do you find meaningful in being told all you need to know?
You are not thinking when you post the links that wont work from non members of telegram etc
I want to emphasize that 'everything you need to know' is a patronising cliche. Dont use it.
Use a relational honouring to guide your words. Not a marketing PR