How the germ theory of disease promotes a victim mentality leading to perpetual illnesses that governments and the pharmaceutical industry capitalize on
Somethings we alternative healers began to teach our clients over 30 years ago. Your health is your journey and it does not belong to anyone else as a responsibility outside of a few shared issues. And even then, how we respond or not is our choice. Thank you for a lovely essay on that subject.
Very well said! Something those of us in the alternative health world have been trying to teach/ explain for years. Even being laughed at or called freaks. But yet we haven't had series health crisis either. So who is the freak?
Fantastic Alec! And as I heard Kelly point out the allopathic model (rescuer) teams up with you (victim) against the perpetrator (your Body or the natural world). That cycle goes on and on with each and every symptom😣
I am so glad that you posted to substack. I had no idea about the possibilities that you touched on in your article. I took the exit link that you highlighted and the found the wealth of reports. I will be digging in there from now on. I find this fascinating. Thanks
Thanks Alec for the insights and resources into the terrain theory. The opening of this post reminds me of the Karpman Drama Triangle theory. This model has the victim, the persecutor and the enabler. This theory teaches when there is no victim, there is no drama :)
I've met people who exemplify what you describe in this article, and have told them, as much as I could, exactly what you're saying here.
If I've encountered many more of them, that may have been all that I would say on the subject. But, in my hours of peace and quiet, I have additional thoughts on this subject:
What does it mean for a child to take "responsibility" for his or her mumps?
What does it mean for an octogenarian to take responsibility for his increasing frailty?
What does it mean for the quarter of humanity that lacks access to safe drinkable water, to take personal responsibility for their day-to-day health?
It's not that these questions are "Gotcha" certainly. It's that they show the issue of individual responsibility for one's health is often less than straightforward.
For example, it may be that the said quarter of humanity without drinkable water needs to take responsibility for their situation through social engagement, by becoming socially organised...
BUT, that goes beyond the much emphasized _individual_ responsibility.
Other potential problems :
1. Stefan Lanka and Ryke Geerd Hamer say that it is pretty much false to think of illness as a state that is unnatural, abnormal, or an effect of some evil force. We embrace their view. But then, what does it mean to take personal responsibility for something that is quite normal and natural?
2. Seeing illness in that light is in accordance with the fact that, according to anthropologists, collective care for the sick and frail has been commonplace during much of human past, especially during the the Neolithic. The notion of individual responsibility should be put in relation to that deeply human tradition.
3. America and the West have become a world populated by lonely people, historians say this is an age of social atomization and alienation. At the same time, there's this decline in the sense of individual responsibility.
We bewail and wonder about each of them separately, - without connecting them.
4. We're against transhumanism. Transhumanism is for increasing the separation of humanity from its natural environment. That's inhumane. But, if we individually determine practically everything in our lives irrespective of the circumstances,it implies that that the separation of humanity from nature is a fundamental fact, & trying to change it must be morally weak.
Very well said. This is a psy-op we are living through, and it's important to understand our human psychological reactions. It's a learning curve, too. Even though I had (almost) all the information I needed to get healthy a few years ago, it still took me awhile to disentangle my mind and my emotions from my programming (we all grew up on television and crappy food after all.) Getting clear on the underpinnings of this matrix system and how it was lying to me, how I was even letting it lie to me, finally showed me the way out. It's not easy - we are not just battling our own addictions and misinformation - we must necessarily go against our own families sometimes. Keep it up!
Somethings we alternative healers began to teach our clients over 30 years ago. Your health is your journey and it does not belong to anyone else as a responsibility outside of a few shared issues. And even then, how we respond or not is our choice. Thank you for a lovely essay on that subject.
And they couldn't even prove transmission of the Spanish flu among others
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/67902
Good one Alec. Stepping into our power.
Thank you for waking up the sleepers!🙏
Climate Change is also a pseudoscience that promotes victimhood.
The system of indoctrination runs deep.
Read Dr. John Coleman's book on the Club of Rome.
Very well said! Something those of us in the alternative health world have been trying to teach/ explain for years. Even being laughed at or called freaks. But yet we haven't had series health crisis either. So who is the freak?
Fantastic Alec! And as I heard Kelly point out the allopathic model (rescuer) teams up with you (victim) against the perpetrator (your Body or the natural world). That cycle goes on and on with each and every symptom😣
I am so glad that you posted to substack. I had no idea about the possibilities that you touched on in your article. I took the exit link that you highlighted and the found the wealth of reports. I will be digging in there from now on. I find this fascinating. Thanks
Thanks Alec for the insights and resources into the terrain theory. The opening of this post reminds me of the Karpman Drama Triangle theory. This model has the victim, the persecutor and the enabler. This theory teaches when there is no victim, there is no drama :)
Your message here https://t.me/TheWayFwrd/4729 encouraged me to post these thoughts of mine.
I've met people who exemplify what you describe in this article, and have told them, as much as I could, exactly what you're saying here.
If I've encountered many more of them, that may have been all that I would say on the subject. But, in my hours of peace and quiet, I have additional thoughts on this subject:
What does it mean for a child to take "responsibility" for his or her mumps?
What does it mean for an octogenarian to take responsibility for his increasing frailty?
What does it mean for the quarter of humanity that lacks access to safe drinkable water, to take personal responsibility for their day-to-day health?
It's not that these questions are "Gotcha" certainly. It's that they show the issue of individual responsibility for one's health is often less than straightforward.
For example, it may be that the said quarter of humanity without drinkable water needs to take responsibility for their situation through social engagement, by becoming socially organised...
BUT, that goes beyond the much emphasized _individual_ responsibility.
Other potential problems :
1. Stefan Lanka and Ryke Geerd Hamer say that it is pretty much false to think of illness as a state that is unnatural, abnormal, or an effect of some evil force. We embrace their view. But then, what does it mean to take personal responsibility for something that is quite normal and natural?
2. Seeing illness in that light is in accordance with the fact that, according to anthropologists, collective care for the sick and frail has been commonplace during much of human past, especially during the the Neolithic. The notion of individual responsibility should be put in relation to that deeply human tradition.
3. America and the West have become a world populated by lonely people, historians say this is an age of social atomization and alienation. At the same time, there's this decline in the sense of individual responsibility.
We bewail and wonder about each of them separately, - without connecting them.
4. We're against transhumanism. Transhumanism is for increasing the separation of humanity from its natural environment. That's inhumane. But, if we individually determine practically everything in our lives irrespective of the circumstances,it implies that that the separation of humanity from nature is a fundamental fact, & trying to change it must be morally weak.
I hope that this post can stimulate thinking
Hiya, please read my post on the mad world the vaccine pushers have got us in https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/were-so-far-down-the-rabbit-hole?s=w
Very well said. This is a psy-op we are living through, and it's important to understand our human psychological reactions. It's a learning curve, too. Even though I had (almost) all the information I needed to get healthy a few years ago, it still took me awhile to disentangle my mind and my emotions from my programming (we all grew up on television and crappy food after all.) Getting clear on the underpinnings of this matrix system and how it was lying to me, how I was even letting it lie to me, finally showed me the way out. It's not easy - we are not just battling our own addictions and misinformation - we must necessarily go against our own families sometimes. Keep it up!