"I don't believe in terrain theory."
I oftentimes hear people say something to the effect of, “I’ve explored terrain theory, but I just don’t believe it.”
First, it’s not terrain theory— it’s the terrain model.
And if you’ve explored it, you must know about the so-called science of Louis Pasteur and the science of Antoine Bechamp.
And you also must’ve read John Franklin Enders’ experiment “isolating” the measles virus.
And you know about the Perth Group and the true history of HIV/AIDS.
And you’ve read about virologist Stefan Lanka’s victory in German court regarding the so-called “measles virus,” as well as his control experiments during the COVID-era.
And of course, you’ve scoured through countless virus isolation studies, reading and understanding the methods section to see if their procedures actually adhere to the scientific method.
And you also know that, in the over 50 experimental attempts to demonstrate that disease is spread via the fluids of a sick person using what would be considered natural means—including Milton Rosenau’s experiments during the height of the Spanish flu— every one of them failed.
Surely, you also understand logical fallacies and how proponents of virology constantly employ them in place of legitimate, empirical evidence.
And you’ve read Christine Massey’s FOI requests asking for proof of a virus to various governments and health institutions around the world.
And you know about Marvin Haberland’s success challenging the German government in court.
And you’ve looked into the work of biologist Harold Hillman and the problems he present with various forms of microscopy and cell biology, and the work of Harvey, Josh and Adam Bigelsen.
You know about German New Medicine, pleomorphism, the human-biofield, and the work of Gerald Pollack, Gilbert Ling, Masaru Emoto, and Veda Austin with respect to 4th phase water.
Surely, you’ve explored all of these and so much more.
Otherwise, you haven’t really explored the terrain model. And it's imperative that you do, so that we can dissolve the fear-based, reductionist, pseudoscientific germ hypothesis that underpins much of western medicine once and for all.
Hi Alex, I do follow the terrain model and have done for nearly 3 years now, since I started looking into it. I also follow Jeff Green, not to be awkward, but because I stumbled across the No Virus team and Jeff at the same time. Its a shame their is so much beef between both camps as I feel you have so much more in common than that which divides. I'm not blaming anyone and don't know the full depth of what's been said between the camps. To me, in the time we are in, the fight must be against the contagion lie, which you both both seem to agree on.
As someone who is not completely wedded to anything except perhaps informed consent, ability to seek out other opinions, and choose for myself, please explain reasons for how a family experiences the same very specific symptoms in a short amount of time, and the same specific sickness appears to be "spread" to others in close contact. Also, isn't it possible to believe in both germs and the terrain model? I'm open-minded, but there's a difference between being brought into a cage and born into a cage, so a little slack and patience -knowing each person has varied time available to dedicate to the topic when there are many issues to address these days - would be appreciated. Also, how similar is this question of whether viruses exist to the question of whether electrons exist?